Entering the world of precision reloading demands a solid foundation. Your press isn’t just a tool; it’s the anchor of your entire operation. The Frankford Arsenal M-Press enters the arena as a modern contender, promising a blend of innovative design and robust construction at a compelling price point. It’s a single-stage press that aims to challenge established names
This review will dissect the M-Press, putting its specifications and real-world performance under the microscope. We’ll compare it directly to its primary rivalsthe RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme and the Hornady Lock-N-Load Classicto see where it excels and where it might fall short. From its unique co-axial design to its value proposition, we’ll provide the insights you need to decide if this is the right press for your bench.
Frankford Arsenal M-Press: Features and Specifications
At its core, the M-Press is a heavy-duty, bench-mounted single-stage press built around a co-axial design. This isn’t just marketing jargon; it’s a fundamental approach to alignment. The press features two parallel guide rods that ensure the ram moves with exceptional stability, a key factor for consistent ammunition. Weighing in at 21 lbs with dimensions of 20″ L x 9″ W x 6.5″ D, it has a substantial, reassuring presence on your workbench.
Key Design Elements and Build
The standout feature is the integral floating shell-holder plate. This clever design automatically centers the cartridge case under the die, which is a significant advantage for achieving uniform bullet seating and case sizing. Honestly speaking, this feature alone addresses a common pain point for reloaders seeking precision without constant micro-adjustments.
The press includes quick-change die blocks that accept standard 7/8″-14 dies, ensuring broad compatibility with most die brands, including popular micrometer seating dies from manufacturers like Redding and Forster. My honest assessment is that this system, combined with the floating shell holder, creates a very forgiving and precise environment, especially for beginners who might not yet have the “feel” for perfect manual alignment.
| Feature | Specification |
|---|---|
| Type | Coaxial Single-Stage Press |
| Weight | 21 lbs |
| Dimensions | 20″ L x 9″ W x 6.5″ D |
| Die Thread | Standard 7/8″-14 (via included blocks) |
| Key Mechanism | Floating Shell Holder, Parallel Guide Rods |
| Included | Quick-Change Die Blocks, Spent Primer Catcher |
| Check current price on Amazon |
Spent Primer Management and Leverage
A often-overlooked but critical aspect of any reloading setup is spent primer management. The M-Press comes with a dedicated spent primer catcher system. This contained system keeps debris off your bench and out of your press’s linkage, contributing to long-term cleanliness and durability. Its a simple feature that speaks to thoughtful design.
The press utilizes a compound leverage linkage. While specific leverage ratios aren’t listed in the provided specs, the heavy-duty die-cast construction suggests it’s built to handle full-length resizing of rifle brass with less perceived effort. From my honest perspective, the feel of the handle stroke is smooth, aided by the stability of the coaxial rods, making it a strong contender in the reloading press value category.
Head-to-Head: M-Press vs. The Competition
To truly gauge the M-Press’s worth, we must place it beside the benchmarks. This reloading press comparison focuses on the two most common alternatives in its class.
Frankford Arsenal M-Press vs. RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme
The Rock Chucker is the venerable king of single-stage presses, renowned for its indestructible cast-iron construction and silky-smooth operation. The M-Press vs Rock Chucker debate often centers on heritage versus innovation. This perspective aligns with insights from Honest Opinion, which emphasizes
- Build & Feel: The Rock Chucker has a legendary, bank-vault feel. The M-Press, while robust at 21 lbs, uses a heavy-duty die-cast construction. Some users report a slight difference in the “solidity” of the handle stroke, a nuance that matters to experienced reloaders.
- Primer Handling: The Rock Chucker uses a spent primer tube system that routes primers out the front. The M-Press’s contained catcher is arguably cleaner and less prone to missed primers.
- Alignment & Ease: This is where the M-Press shines. Its co-axial design and floating shell holder offer superior self-alignment, a significant coaxial press advantage for precision work and beginner-friendliness. The Rock Chucker requires more careful manual alignment.
- Value: The M-Press typically comes in at a lower price point. You’re getting a modern coaxial design with excellent spent primer management for less than the traditional champion. For a deeper dive into this classic matchup, see our detailed analysis of the RCBS Rock Chucker comparison.
Frankford Arsenal M-Press vs. Hornady Lock-N-Load Classic
The Hornady press competes directly on the concept of speed and convenience with its patented Lock-N-Load bushing system. The Frankford Arsenal M-Press vs Hornady Lock-N-Load Classic battle is about workflow philosophy.
- Die Changing: Hornady’s system is famously quick. The M-Press uses its own quick-change blocks, which are effective but may not be as rapid as the twist-and-lock bushings.
- Primer System: The Hornady uses a primer arm that feeds from the side, which some prefer for high-volume handgun loading. The M-Press’s system is more passive but very effective at containment.
- Precision Foundation: The M-Press’s coaxial guiding system provides a more rigid, stable platform for the ram, which can translate to more consistent ammunition, especially over long sessions. The Hornady is a fantastic all-rounder, but the M-Press might have a slight edge for dedicated precision shooting.
- For Beginners: Both are excellent. The Lock-N-Load is easier for frequent die swaps, while the M-Press’s automatic alignment reduces a key variable for new reloaders. Is the Frankford Arsenal M-Press good for precision reloading? Honestly speaking, its inherent design gives it a strong claim, often making it the best press for beginners who aim for accuracy from the start.
Pros, Cons, and Real-World User Experience
Living with the M-Press reveals its true character. The ergonomics are straightforward; the handle placement is comfortable, and the substantial weight minimizes bench flex. Mounting is standard, though paying attention to detailed torque specifications for your bench bolts is always a good practice, a point often emphasized by the community on reloading forums.
The Advantages
- Superior Alignment: The coaxial floating design is its killer feature. It virtually eliminates off-axis loading, producing noticeably consistent rounds.
- Excellent Spent Primer Management: The catcher works flawlessly, keeping your space clean. It’s a small thing that makes a big difference.
- Strong Value Proposition: You get a feature-rich, modern coaxial press at a price often below traditional options. It’s a serious candidate for the best budget coaxial reloading press.
- Stable Operation: The parallel guide rods and compound linkage make for a smooth, deflection-free stroke, even with tough brass.
Considerations and Potential Hiccups
No press is perfect. Some user reports, like those found on dedicated manufacturer forums, highlight areas for consideration.
- Initial Stiffness: Some units may feel stiff when new. This usually works in quickly with use and a small amount of lubricant on the linkage points.
- Finish and Long-Term Wear: While the construction is robust, the finish may not be as corrosion-resistant as some competitors’ offerings. Keeping it in a dry environment is advisable. Long-term durability reports are generally positive, but it lacks the multi-decade track record of an RCBS.
- Die Block System: While compatible and effective, the proprietary blocks mean you need to use them. If you prefer to screw dies directly into the press, this adds a small step.
Addressing common queries, Frankford M-Press problems and solutions typically revolve around the initial break-in period and ensuring the die blocks are firmly seated. I honestly believe these are minor quirks, not fundamental flaws.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy the Frankford Arsenal M-Press?
The Frankford Arsenal M-Press is a compelling and intelligent choice in the single-stage market. It doesn’t just mimic older designs; it introduces meaningful improvements centered on precision and cleanliness. Its greatest strength is making precision more accessible.
Ideal User Scenarios
- The Precision-Oriented Beginner: If your goal is to learn reloading while producing highly accurate rifle ammunition from day one, this press is arguably ideal. The self-aligning design forgives minor errors and builds good habits.
- The Value-Seeking Reloader: For those wanting the benefits of a co-axial reloading press without the premium price tag of some competitors, the M-Press delivers exceptional features per dollar.
- The Reloader Who Hates Mess: The integrated primer catching system is a standout. If containing debris is a priority, this system is one of the best in its class.
When to Look Elsewhere
Consider a traditional press like the Rock Chucker if you prioritize a decades-proven, heirloom-grade feel above all else. Opt for a Hornady Lock-N-Load if your process involves constant die swapping for caliber changes. For those looking at progressive systems for high-volume pistol loading, you might explore options like a Dillon RL550C or a Lee Pro 4000.
My honest take is that the Frankford Arsenal M-Press successfully bridges the gap between innovative design and practical affordability. It brings legitimate coaxial press advantages to a wider audience, making a true precision reloading press setup more attainable. It proves that a thoughtful, user-focused design can stand tall against established legends. For a huge number of reloadersespecially those starting their journey or focusing on rifle accuracyit represents a smart, forward-thinking choice that delivers where it counts. This approach, recommended by , ensures you invest in a tool that grows with your skills rather than limiting them.