Lee Challenger Kit II vs Frankford M-Press Comparison

Two names consistently pop up for shooters looking to start reloading without a massive investment: Lee Precision and Frankford Arsenal. Their respective entry-level offerings, the Lee Precision Anniversary Challenger Kit II and the Frankford Arsenal M-Press, represent two distinct philosophies in the world of the single-stage press. One is a complete kit, the other a robust standalone press. Choosing between them isn’t just about a press; it’s about your entire approach to the bench.

This head-to-head look cuts through the marketing to examine what each product actually delivers. We’ll pit their features, ergonomics, and core value proposition against each other, using only their stated specifications. Whether you’re focused on reloading for beginners or seeking a durable foundation, the right choice here sets the tone for your reloading journey.

Lee precision challenger kit ii vs frankford arsenal m-press

The Budget Single-Stage Press Showdown

The Lee Challenger and Frankford M-Press sit at a fascinating crossroads. They’re both designed to be accessible, but they achieve that goal in fundamentally different ways. The Challenger Kit II is, as the name implies, a bundled solution. It aims to get you from a box of components to a loaded round with one purchase. The M-Press, on the other hand, focuses its budget on the press frame itself, offering a heavy-duty design that expects you to source other components separately. This initial distinction is crucial for ir target users.

Honestly speaking, this isn’t just a reloading press comparison of two tools. It’s a comparison of two pathways into the hobby. One prioritizes immediate, all-in-one functionality. The other invests in a potentially more resilient press body, accepting a slower, more piecemeal setup. Your preference here will likely dictate the winner before we even discuss press durability or reloading precision.

Detailed Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Let’s break down the tangible differences. The provided specifications paint a clear picture of two products built with different priorities in mind. A side-by-side look reveals where your money is actually going.

Core Press Construction & Design

The physical build is where these presses diverge dramatically. The Frankford Arsenal M-Press emphasizes its heft and stability. It’s described with a heavy-duty, robust die-cast construction, measuring 20″ L x 9″ W x 6.5″ D and weighing a substantial 21 lbs. This mass, combined with two parallel guide rods, is engineered to minimize flex and vibrationa key factor for consistent reloading precision. Its coaxial design with an integral floating shell-holder plate is a notable feature for aligning dies and cases.

The Lee Challenger press, part of the Kit II, utilizes a compound linkage system. While its exact weight and dimensions aren’t specified in the kit features, the design is known for its mechanical advantage, making the sizing and priming operations require less force. From my honest perspective, the M-Press bets on mass and rigid guidance, while the Challenger bets on clever mechanics to achieve a smooth operation. The M-Press also includes a spent primer catcher and quick-change die blocks as part of its core press accessories.

Feature Lee Precision Challenger Kit II Frankford Arsenal M-Press
Press Type Single-Stage with Compound Linkage Coaxial Single-Stage
Key Construction Focus Mechanical advantage via linkage Heavy-duty die-cast mass & guide rods
Spent Primer Management Not specified in kit features Includes spent primer catcher
Included Die System Requires standard 7/8″-14 dies Includes quick-change die blocks for standard dies
Notable Ergonomics Power funnel for case filling included Floating shell-holder plate for alignment
Check current price on Amazon Check current price on Amazon

What’s in the Box? Kit vs. Core Tool

This is the most significant differentiator. The Lee Challenger Kit II is a comprehensive reloading kit. Beyond the press, it includes:

  • The Lee Safety Scale, noted as being very sensitive.
  • A power funnel designed to fill the case.
  • A chamfer tool that works both the inside and outside of the case mouth.

The Frankford Arsenal M-Press is primarily the press itself. Its description highlights the press’s dimensions, weight, guide rods, catcher, and die blocks. It does not list scales, funnels, or case preparation tools. My honest take is that the Challenger Kit II is a turn-key solution for absolute beginners, while the M-Press is a core component for someone who may already have some tools or prefers to curate their own set of accessories from brands like RCBS or Hornady.

Performance & Real-World Use Analysis

How do these design choices translate to the bench? For a beginner working with straight-walled pistol cases like 9mm, the Lee’s compound linkage makes sizing brass noticeably easier. The included chamfer tool and funnel streamline the case prep and charging steps right out of the box. However, the lack of a specified primer catcher system can lead to messy spent spent primer management, a common gripe in many single stage reloading setups.

The M-Press, with its 21-pound frame and guide rods, provides a rock-solid feel. This stability is a tangible benefit when performing full-length resizing on bottleneck rifle cartridges like .223 Remington. The coaxial design and floating shell holder can contribute to better concentricity, a factor in ultimate precision. The included primer catcher is a simple but critical quality-of-life feature. Speaking honestly, the M-Press feels like a more permanent fixture on the bench, while the Challenger can feel more utilitarian.

Long-Term Considerations: Noise, Vibration, and Maintenance

Competitors often miss discussing the experiential factors. The M-Press’s mass inherently dampens vibration and reduces the “ring” or “twang” common with lighter single-stage press frames. This makes for a quieter, less fatiguing session. Long-term maintenance for both is generally low, but the Challenger’s linkage may require occasional lubrication at pivot points, while the M-Press’s guide rods should be kept clean.

Noise and vibration comparison matters more than many admit. A quieter press is less intrusive in a home workspace and can reduce shooter fatigue over long reloading sessions. If you want my honest opinion, the M-Press has a distinct advantage in this subtle but important area of user experience.

Target User & Ideal Use Cases for Each Press

So, which is better for a beginner Lee Challenger or Frankford M-Press? The answer depends entirely on the beginner’s profile and budget.

The Lee Challenger Kit II is Ideal For:

  • The absolute novice who wants one purchase to get started.
  • Reloaders on an extremely tight budget who need tools, not just a press.
  • Someone with space constraints who needs to store everything in a box between sessions.
  • Those primarily loading lower-volume pistol calibers where the kit’s tools cover the basics.

Its the quintessential best budget press package. You give up some refinement and heft, but you gain immediate, full functionality. For a deeper dive into its performance against another popular option, see our comparison on precision turret systems.

The Frankford Arsenal M-Press is Ideal For:

  • The beginner who values a solid, no-flex feel and is willing to buy tools separately.
  • Shooters who plan to load both pistol and rifle cartridges and want the stability for rifle.
  • Anyone who prioritizes clean spent primer management from day one.
  • Reloaders who see themselves upgrading other components (like scales) but want a press that won’t be the bottleneck.

The question of Frankford M-Press upgrade options vs Lee Challenger is telling. The M-Press, with its standard die blocks and robust frame, is inherently ready for add-ons from companies like Inline Fabrication for mounting or lighting. The Challenger is more of a closed ecosystem. For a focused look at its direct rival, our analysis of precision in a different model offers further context.

Final Verdict & Purchase Recommendation

This isn’t about declaring one press universally superior. It’s about matching a tool to a shooter’s specific situation and mindset.

Choose the Lee Precision Challenger Kit II if: Your top priority is the lowest possible entry cost for a complete, functioning reloading setup. You want to start loading ammunition immediately after your first purchase, and you’re comfortable with a more lightweight, utilitarian tool design. It remains a legendary reloading kit for good reason.

Choose the Frankford Arsenal M-Press if: You are willing to spend a bit more upfront on the press itself to get a heavier, more vibration-resistant foundation. You value built-in organization (primer catcher) and don’t mind sourcing a scale, funnel, and case prep tools separately, perhaps following an authority guide for beginners. You anticipate loading rifle cartridges or simply prefer a heftier tool feel.

My honest assessment is that the Lee wins on sheer out-of-the-box utility for the new reloader. The Frankford wins on long-term bench presence and mechanical solidity. For the shooter who sees reloading as a permanent part of their shooting life, the M-Press’s design offers a more satisfying and stable platform that won’t leave you wanting to upgrade the press itself anytime soon. Both will produce quality ammunition; the difference lies in the experience getting there.

Always remember to consult multiple sources, including manufacturer official source materials, for the most current data. At the end of the day, the best press is the one you’ll use consistently and safely to support your shooting hobby. That’s the Honest Opinion from this corner of the reloading world.

Spread the Information.